Re: an update of the use case document

Ben,

I was not sure how to send the review to you  so that you can process it
 easily. Finally, I will send you a series of mails, with various use
case comments. I will bind together some of the use case comments that
are really just minor editing.

A general editorial comment: I think quoting the full title of the use
case everywhere in the text makes it very difficult to read. I would
prefer to have simply a references to Use Case #2 (with link) and not
the full text. But that may be only me.

I.

Ben Adida wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I've updated (and will continue to update today) the use case document:
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/scenarios/
> 
> If you have a chance, take a look at it quickly and send me your
> thoughts. I'm just applying the WG's requested changes about not having
> any RDFa markup in the doc, stating the principles more clearly, etc...
> 
> I'm still working on the section that was requested about "difference
> with microformats" and seeing how to integrate TimBL's additional use
> case of RDF lists.
> 
> -Ben
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf