Ben, I was not sure how to send the review to you so that you can process it easily. Finally, I will send you a series of mails, with various use case comments. I will bind together some of the use case comments that are really just minor editing. A general editorial comment: I think quoting the full title of the use case everywhere in the text makes it very difficult to read. I would prefer to have simply a references to Use Case #2 (with link) and not the full text. But that may be only me. I. Ben Adida wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've updated (and will continue to update today) the use case document: > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/scenarios/ > > If you have a chance, take a look at it quickly and send me your > thoughts. I'm just applying the WG's requested changes about not having > any RDFa markup in the doc, stating the principles more clearly, etc... > > I'm still working on the section that was requested about "difference > with microformats" and seeing how to integrate TimBL's additional use > case of RDF lists. > > -Ben > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdfReceived on Tuesday, 30 January 2007 12:26:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:03 GMT