Missing Use case? [Re: an update of the use case document]

I know, I should come up with a text but I did not have the time yet:-)
But I think that, at the f2f, we discussed another use case from a
totally different angle.

X wants to publish a large(er) vocabulary in RDFS and/or OWL. X also
wants to provide a clear, human readable description of the same
vocabulary. Using RDFa, the terms themselves can be mixed with a
descriptive text in HTML. The RDFa engine can then extract the
vocabulary in RDF/XML and/or n3 formats, to be included used directly by
RDF aware applications (eg, reasoners).

Maybe Alistair can get some example from the SKOS spec....


Ben Adida wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I've updated (and will continue to update today) the use case document:
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/scenarios/
> 
> If you have a chance, take a look at it quickly and send me your
> thoughts. I'm just applying the WG's requested changes about not having
> any RDFa markup in the doc, stating the principles more clearly, etc...
> 
> I'm still working on the section that was requested about "difference
> with microformats" and seeing how to integrate TimBL's additional use
> case of RDF lists.
> 
> -Ben
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf