I know, I should come up with a text but I did not have the time yet:-) But I think that, at the f2f, we discussed another use case from a totally different angle. X wants to publish a large(er) vocabulary in RDFS and/or OWL. X also wants to provide a clear, human readable description of the same vocabulary. Using RDFa, the terms themselves can be mixed with a descriptive text in HTML. The RDFa engine can then extract the vocabulary in RDF/XML and/or n3 formats, to be included used directly by RDF aware applications (eg, reasoners). Maybe Alistair can get some example from the SKOS spec.... Ben Adida wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've updated (and will continue to update today) the use case document: > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/scenarios/ > > If you have a chance, take a look at it quickly and send me your > thoughts. I'm just applying the WG's requested changes about not having > any RDFa markup in the doc, stating the principles more clearly, etc... > > I'm still working on the section that was requested about "difference > with microformats" and seeing how to integrate TimBL's additional use > case of RDF lists. > > -Ben > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdfReceived on Tuesday, 30 January 2007 12:26:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:03 GMT