W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > August 2007

Re: Interesting experience: my foaf in RDFa

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 09:22:35 +0100
Message-ID: <46CFE6CB.1020405@danbri.org>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
CC: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>, W3C RDFa task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, eyal.oren@deri.org, Frédérick Giasson <fred@fgiasson.com>

Ivan Herman wrote:
> 
> Dan Brickley wrote:
>>> However, one thing _really_ bugs me: Our nice (X)HTML+RDFa documents are
>>> ignored by 'Semantic Web search engines' as ptsw [2] or sindice [3].
>>> People, move on!
>> Can I put in a vote for W3C to spend some effort on updating the RDF
>> Validator (http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator)? I reckon that, alongside
>> the syntax checker at validator.w3.org, will go a long way to pushing
>> these developments out into wider usage.
>>
> 
> I am not sure what the current state of the problems are. My foaf.html
> file validates!

http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/ARPServlet?URI=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ivan-herman.net%2Ffoaf.html&PARSE=Parse+URI%3A+&TRIPLES_AND_GRAPH=PRINT_TRIPLES&FORMAT=PNG_EMBED

Error: Your document does not contain any RDF statement.

"RDF Validator" vs "RDFa mode of validator.w3.org" confusion? I was 
talking about the one that extracts triples and draws pretty graphs...

Dan
Received on Saturday, 25 August 2007 08:22:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:09 GMT