W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > April 2007

Re: ISSUE-29 MIME type for RDFa - proposed resolution to be voted on next week

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:28:57 -0500
To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
Cc: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1176784137.23073.26.camel@dirk>

On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 21:58 -0400, Ben Adida wrote:
> Hi all,
> As per today's telecon, we have come to a tentative resolution on the
> MIME type question, ISSUE-29. Since we were missing some key folks on
> today's call, we're voting on this resolution next week.
> Proposed Resolution:
> The MIME type of an RDFa-compliant document should conform to the
> recommendation for the host language. For example, for an XHTML1.1+RDFa
> document, the MIME type should be application/xhtml+xml. If the XHTML WG
> determines a way to deliver XHTML1.1 using a different MIME type, then
> an XHTML1.1+RDFa document can be delivered accordingly.

I'm interested to see how that impacts the test materials.

I suggest updating one or two tests before the decision is made.

I wonder how this interacts with the "RDFa in HTML" thread.
In some sense it's orthogonal. Or is this meant to exclude
those designs?

By "XHTML WG", do you mean the XHTML 2 WG or the HTML WG? Or
does it matter?

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2007 04:28:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:22 UTC