W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > April 2007

Re: ISSUE-29 MIME type for RDFa - proposed resolution to be voted on next week

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 07:33:46 -0500
Message-ID: <4624BEAA.7070604@aptest.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
CC: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>

Dan Connolly wrote:
> I wonder how this interacts with the "RDFa in HTML" thread.
> In some sense it's orthogonal. Or is this meant to exclude
> those designs?
IMHO it is meant to accommodate them - HTML has a media type, so if 
there is an HTML+RDFa it should use that media type.
> By "XHTML WG", do you mean the XHTML 2 WG or the HTML WG? Or
> does it matter?
The XHTML 2 WG is what we were talking about at the time.

Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2007 12:34:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:22 UTC