Fantastic stuff! This is excellent. Again, thanks for all your hard work on this. Two quick points noted by the CC folks: 1) xmlns still not supported.... darn DTDs, right? What's the path to fixing the W3C validator in this regard? Does it have to be schema-based? 2) it seems the document must be served as application/xhtml+xml... but XHTML 1.1 should be servable as text/html, right? Is there a deeper issue here that I don't understand? -Ben Shane McCarron wrote: > > As per my implied action item from earlier today, note that an Editor's > Draft of the xhtml-rdfa module document is available at > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2007/ED-xhtml-rdfa-20070402/ > > This draft is not yet connected to the main MarkUp page, nor to the new > Drafts area we are setting up. Once established, I will send out a > subsequent note. > > Finally, note that if you create documents using the example markup > language as defined in Appendix C, using the DOCTYPE with public and > system identifiers as specified therein: > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML+RDFa 1.0//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml+rdfa-1.dtd"> > > such documents can validate using the W3C validation service > automatically. I trust this is what people were looking for. > > I look forward to feedback on this early draft! >Received on Monday, 2 April 2007 18:44:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:04 GMT