W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > April 2007

Re: XHTML-RDFa draft made public

From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 14:45:48 -0400
Message-ID: <46114F5C.3040702@adida.net>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
CC: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, HTML WG <w3c-html-wg@w3.org>

Fantastic stuff! This is excellent. Again, thanks for all your hard work
on this.

Two quick points noted by the CC folks:

1) xmlns still not supported.... darn DTDs, right? What's the path to
fixing the W3C validator in this regard? Does it have to be schema-based?

2) it seems the document must be served as application/xhtml+xml... but
XHTML 1.1 should be servable as text/html, right? Is there a deeper
issue here that I don't understand?


Shane McCarron wrote:
> As per my implied action item from earlier today, note that an Editor's
> Draft of the xhtml-rdfa module document is available at
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2007/ED-xhtml-rdfa-20070402/
> This draft is not yet connected to the main MarkUp page, nor to the new
> Drafts area we are setting up.  Once established, I will send out a
> subsequent note.
> Finally, note that if you create documents using the example markup
> language as defined in Appendix C, using the DOCTYPE with public and
> system identifiers as specified therein:
>    <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML+RDFa 1.0//EN"
>                          "http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml+rdfa-1.dtd">
> such documents can validate using the W3C validation service
> automatically.  I trust this is what people were looking for.
> I look forward to feedback on this early draft!
Received on Monday, 2 April 2007 18:44:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:22 UTC