W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > April 2006

Re: New RDFa Primer Draft

From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:01:19 +0200
To: "Ben Adida" <ben@mit.edu>, "public-rdf-in-xhtml task force" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.s8ig0hg8smjzpq@acer3010.lan>

Looks good.

Some comments:

(It doesn't display in Opera, OK, that will be fixed).

Section 1:

	It is not about embedding RDF syntax into XHTML documents.  =>
  	It is not about embedding RDF/XML syntax into XHTML documents.

Examples: Several are too long to print in IE with default settings.

2.2:
	using extra tags and attributes =>
	using extra elements and attributes

to avoid any misunderstanding w.r.t. the other sort of tags.

	The first step is to "load" the iCal vocabulary into the HTML page: =>
	The first step is to reference the iCal vocabulary from the HTML page:

the current wording is misleading. There is no loading going on.

2.3: Add after
	She notes, however, that the vCard schema does not require declaring a  
vCard type.

	(i.e. there will be no role attribute this time).

Still, I really agree with Mark that it is a pity that there is no  
upperlevel type here. On the other hand I think it is really important  
that we use existing vocabularies, to emphasise which bits are the new  
bits.

4.3.
Did we really agree that meta and link only talk about their parent  
element? (We may have and I forgot). One thing I really want to achieve is  
that meta and link in XHTML <head> still mean the same things.

4.4
We should probably point out that ":next" is the same as "next" for a  
CURIE. Don't we prefer "next" in fact? Do we need ":next"?

Steven

On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 18:14:19 +0200, Ben Adida <ben@mit.edu> wrote:

>
>
> Hi all,
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/2006-04-24-rdfa-primer
>
> is the current draft of the RDFa Primer. Yes, I'm trying "RDFa" on for  
> size :)
Received on Monday, 24 April 2006 12:01:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:01 GMT