W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > April 2006

Re: New RDFa Primer Draft

From: Ben Adida <ben@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:15:11 -0400
Message-Id: <63E85109-2E59-4CCF-95F8-DC901FDDB1F9@mit.edu>
Cc: "public-rdf-in-xhtml task force" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
To: "Steven Pemberton" <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>


Steven,

Thanks for the comments on such short notice :)

On Apr 24, 2006, at 8:01 AM, Steven Pemberton wrote:
> Some comments:
>
> (It doesn't display in Opera, OK, that will be fixed).

Yes, sorry, I only uploaded the XML file.

[...]

> 4.3.
> Did we really agree that meta and link only talk about their parent  
> element? (We may have and I forgot). One thing I really want to  
> achieve is that meta and link in XHTML <head> still mean the same  
> things.

Yes, we agreed on that a while ago. The initial idea came up when  
Mark visited here in Boston:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2005Sep/0026

Completely agreed on making sure meta and link in <head> still mean  
the same thing. Jeremy brought a related issue up, and I have a  
proposal following up his issue on how to ensure that this is the  
case. The basic idea is that <head> has a default of about="", though  
it can be overriden if one really wants to (I suppose in that case,  
link and meta mean different things, so maybe we should discuss it.)

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/2005-current-issues#head- 
about
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Apr/0007

-Ben
Received on Monday, 24 April 2006 12:15:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:01 GMT