W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > May 2005

Re: talking again

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 18:40:55 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <32942.10.0.2.16.1117474855.squirrel@www.foaf-project.org>
To: "Ben Adida" <ben@mit.edu>
Cc: "'public-rdf-in-xhtml task force''" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>

>
>
> Hi team,
>
> I've been unexpectedly busy in the last couple of weeks, but we should
> meet again. I'll be online and ready to meet tomorrow at our usual time
> (1400 UTC), and hopefully enough people will be able to attend.
>
> On our agenda is to get to the bottom of the bnode issue. Please review
> Steven's latest suggestions:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2005May/
> 0008.html
>
> and DanBri's comments:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2005May/
> 0010.html

I talked with Steven about this last week, urging that the only
workable solution was choosing 2 attribute names. Not clear what the best
names are, though.

Since then, a new Working Draft has been published by the HTML WG:

http://www.w3.org/News/2005#item70
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xhtml2-20050527/

http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xhtml2-20050527/mod-meta.html#s_metamodule
and
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xhtml2-20050527/mod-metaAttributes.html#s_metaAttributesmodule
deserve a careful review from this TF.

The latter, from a non-careful look, doesn't yet have bnode-identification
attribs.

I'm not sure I can make the telecon, but I would appreciate if you
would consider discussing the following points anyway:

1. status of an XSLT for parsing the RDF/A notation -  is anyone
planning to do this? Jeremy had some code, not sure how up to date it
is.... (this would plug us into GRDDL directly). Related sub-point - anyone
got a set of test files that encode RDF/A examples?

2. integration with GRDDL (this involves getting stuff into the XHTML
namespace document).

3. I'd like a an 'attaboy!' and a reviewer for my RDFS defining the
XHTML2 link types, see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2005May/0005.html
http://www.w3.org/2005/05/hrel/linktypes.rdf
(talked with Steven last week about these; he expects them to live in
the XHTML namespace. We'd like to encode the schema in RDF/A and put it
in the namespace document, which is related  to (2) above...).

4. note that www-html (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/) has
had some comments on RDF/A, and that having TF participants monitor
that forum would be v useful. The following 2 posts from Sjoerd Visscher
are in particular worth a read:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2005May/0140.html
Difference between role and property Sjoerd Visscher

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2005May/0147.html
The relationship to RDF

That last post partly answers a question I had about whether RDF/A
can distinguish a literal from an xml-literal, regardless of its
textual/tag content. Seems so.

OK that's all I can think of. While I'd like to make the telecon slot
tommorrow, I might need (non-work stuff) to be on a train to london...

cheers,

Dan


> ======
> SW_BPD(rdfxhtml)
> Semantic Web Best Practices
> Tuesdays
> 10:00am-11:00am/14:00-15:00 UTC
> Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7927 ("SWBP")
>
> IRC: irc.w3.org, port 6665, #swbp
> ======
>
>
> -Ben
>
>
Received on Monday, 30 May 2005 17:41:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:59 GMT