- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 12:30:42 +0000
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: SPARQL WG <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Thanks for your hard work Sandro. On 2012-11-07, at 02:29, Sandro Hawke wrote: > === d02 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-query-20121108 > > Please confirm my re-phrasing of the red box about rdf:langstring. We > can't call it "at risk" any more, going to PR. A pedantic reading of > W3C practice might say we can't using rdf:langstring in a REC until > RDF 1.1 Concepts is at least in PR, but I'm comfortable with the text > I proposed here. I think the text there is fine. - Steve -- Steve Harris, CTO Garlik, a part of Experian +44 7854 417 874 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93 80 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 5JL
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2012 12:31:16 UTC