Re: URGENT SPARQL - please check diffs and changelogs on pubs!

=== d05 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-federated-query-20121108

it looks good to me. Thanks a lot for all the work  Sandro :)

cheers,

Carlos


2012/11/6 Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>

> The publications pass all the automated tests, but I may well have broken
> something in the process of getting them there.   So please check the
> color-coded diff linked from each one (it's diff.html), showing the changes
> since the last publication.   And make sure that roughly lines up with
> #changelog for each one.   If it doesn't, then go ahead and edit the
> changelog, or fix whatever else you need to. From the editors draft to
> what's in the publication location, some rewrite scripts are done -- if the
> ED is fine and what's published is broken, be sure to let me know.
>
> A few notes on the specific documents are below.
>
> Please confirm which documents you've checked, until we have at least one
> editor checking each.    HOPEFULLY that will be before about noon ET on
> Wednesday -- otherwise we might have to slide the publication date another
> five days.  :-(
>
>        -- Sandro
>
>
> === d01 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-**sparql11-overview-20121108<http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-overview-20121108>
>
> Nothing special.
>
>
>
> === d02 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-**sparql11-query-20121108<http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-query-20121108>
>
> Please confirm my re-phrasing of the red box about rdf:langstring. We
> can't call it "at risk" any more, going to PR.  A pedantic reading of
> W3C practice might say we can't using rdf:langstring in a REC until
> RDF 1.1 Concepts is at least in PR, but I'm comfortable with the text
> I proposed here.
>
>
>
> === d03 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-**sparql11-update-20121108<http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-update-20121108>
>
> changed  rIRIref to rIRIREF
> changed  [r]VarOrIRIref to [r]VarOrIri
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-**query/#templatesWithBNodes<http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#templatesWithBNodes>doesn't work, but
> it's okay because this does:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-**sparql11-query-20121108/#**
> templatesWithBNodes<http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-query-20121108/#templatesWithBNodes>
>
>
>
> === d04 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-**sparql11-service-description-**
> 20121108<http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-service-description-20121108>
>
> Nothing special.
>
>
> === d05 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-**sparql11-federated-query-**20121108<http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-federated-query-20121108>
>
> Nothing special.
>
>
>
> === d06 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-**sparql11-results-json-20121108<http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-results-json-20121108>
>
> Nothing special.
>
>
>
> === d07 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-**sparql11-results-csv-tsv-**20121108<http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-results-csv-tsv-20121108>
>
> I don't know how to run ReSpec from the command line, so I just made
> the editors draft manually be a PR for now.  Lame, I know.  If you
> edit this, let me know -- the change wont be picked up automatically.
>
>
>
> === d08 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PER-**rdf-sparql-XMLres-20121108<http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PER-rdf-sparql-XMLres-20121108>
>
> Someone should make sure the errata are addressed.  I changed the xsl
> links so we can fix things after publication, at least, but I don't have
> any extra
> brain cells to think about the errata right now.
>
>
>
> === d09 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-**sparql11-entailment-20121108<http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-sparql11-entailment-20121108>
>
> Nothing special.
>
>
>
> === d10 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-**sparql11-protocol-20121108<http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-sparql11-protocol-20121108>
>
> Nothing special.
>
>
> === d11 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-**sparql11-http-rdf-update-**20121108<http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-sparql11-http-rdf-update-20121108>
>
> Nothing special.
>
>
>
>