W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: URGENT SPARQL - please check diffs and changelogs on pubs!

From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 12:43:07 +0100
Message-ID: <CABt65OfXjXe34xo2vPn=nuS2ubuqTE4J7Mpb19j48goCk34C5A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: SPARQL WG <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Sandro,

as I said yesterday in IRC, while checking the broken link I had to
adapt the example in the section as well. This is not yet in the
document. I also added a note to the change log section about the
adapted example (all in xmlspec.xml).

Birte

On 7 November 2012 03:29, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
> The publications pass all the automated tests, but I may well have broken
> something in the process of getting them there.   So please check the
> color-coded diff linked from each one (it's diff.html), showing the changes
> since the last publication.   And make sure that roughly lines up with
> #changelog for each one.   If it doesn't, then go ahead and edit the
> changelog, or fix whatever else you need to. From the editors draft to
> what's in the publication location, some rewrite scripts are done -- if the
> ED is fine and what's published is broken, be sure to let me know.
>
> A few notes on the specific documents are below.
>
> Please confirm which documents you've checked, until we have at least one
> editor checking each.    HOPEFULLY that will be before about noon ET on
> Wednesday -- otherwise we might have to slide the publication date another
> five days.  :-(
>
>        -- Sandro
>
>
> === d01 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-overview-20121108
>
> Nothing special.
>
>
>
> === d02 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-query-20121108
>
> Please confirm my re-phrasing of the red box about rdf:langstring. We
> can't call it "at risk" any more, going to PR.  A pedantic reading of
> W3C practice might say we can't using rdf:langstring in a REC until
> RDF 1.1 Concepts is at least in PR, but I'm comfortable with the text
> I proposed here.
>
>
>
> === d03 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-update-20121108
>
> changed  rIRIref to rIRIREF
> changed  [r]VarOrIRIref to [r]VarOrIri
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#templatesWithBNodes doesn't work, but
> it's okay because this does:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-query-20121108/#templatesWithBNodes
>
>
>
> === d04 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-service-description-20121108
>
> Nothing special.
>
>
> === d05 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-federated-query-20121108
>
> Nothing special.
>
>
>
> === d06 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-results-json-20121108
>
> Nothing special.
>
>
>
> === d07 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-results-csv-tsv-20121108
>
> I don't know how to run ReSpec from the command line, so I just made
> the editors draft manually be a PR for now.  Lame, I know.  If you
> edit this, let me know -- the change wont be picked up automatically.
>
>
>
> === d08 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PER-rdf-sparql-XMLres-20121108
>
> Someone should make sure the errata are addressed.  I changed the xsl
> links so we can fix things after publication, at least, but I don't have any
> extra
> brain cells to think about the errata right now.
>
>
>
> === d09 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-sparql11-entailment-20121108
>
> Nothing special.
>
>
>
> === d10 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-sparql11-protocol-20121108
>
> Nothing special.
>
>
> === d11 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-sparql11-http-rdf-update-20121108
>
> Nothing special.
>
>
>



-- 
Jun. Prof. Dr. Birte Glimm            Tel.:    +49 731 50 24125
Inst. of Artificial Intelligence         Secr:  +49 731 50 24258
University of Ulm                         Fax:   +49 731 50 24188
D-89069 Ulm                               birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de
Germany
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2012 11:43:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT