W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: SPARQL WG Agenda for tomorrow

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:37:39 -0400
Message-ID: <50869DA3.8080609@thefigtrees.net>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
CC: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Thanks for your leadership with the comments, Andy.

Regarding process: for comments that are about misunderstandings or 
things that we simply need to fix, it's fine for any WG member to reply 
officially.

For anything that is requesting a change to a substantive part of a 
spec, we ought to continue with our same process that we've been doing 
to date.

Lee

On 10/22/2012 4:46 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
> Regrets - I'm most likely going to miss the meeting.
>
>
> On 22/10/12 21:29, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Look forward to talking to you tomorrow. Here's what we'll look to 
>> cover:
>>
>>  1. Admin
>>  2. Comment processing
>
> We're getting some comments on the tests. I'm giving persomnal 
> responses where I think can to help the implementer but (1) it's kinda 
> lonely on the comments list currently (2) please check for anything 
> you think needs a WG response and (3) what is the correct process now?
>
>>  3. Entailment regime
>>       * Review what we know about which regimes we're likely to have
>>         implementations from
>>       * Consider marking other regimes informative or at-risk
>>  4. Graph Store Protocol
>>       * Implementation status & validator status
>>       * What if GSP does not make it past CR?
>>  5. Protocol
>>       * Implementation status & validator status
>>  6. Published documents
>>       * Publication date: November 6
>>       * "Changes Since Last Call" section
>>
>> talk to you then,
>> Lee
>>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 13:38:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT