W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: SPARQL WG Agenda for tomorrow

From: Chime Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:06:24 -0400
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <76B17EB30E4A406B9592AC540517AD9C@gmail.com>
On Monday, October 22, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> Review what we know about which regimes we're likely to have implementations from
> Consider marking other regimes informative or at-risk

FYI, I have recently finished adding support for RIF-XML and RIF in RDF parsing for FuXi.  All that is missing are tests.

My plan was to add 2 *basic* tests of:

R rif:usedWithProfile P 

where

- There is a RIF in RDF graph in the the dataset with graph IRI R
- There is a RIF XML document that is dereferenceable from R 

This shouldn't require any changes to the way the manifest format that I'm aware of.

Note, however, that (so far) this is the only projected implementation of this particular regime.
> Graph Store Protocol
> Implementation status & validator status
> What if GSP does not make it past CR?

Are there particular WG criteria that the GSP is at risk of not fulfilling that would cause this to happen?

-- 
Chime Ogbuji

Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com) 
Received on Monday, 22 October 2012 23:06:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT