W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: SPARQL WG Agenda for tomorrow

From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:42:51 +0200
Message-ID: <CABt65Od6H9HVpY31X5dE2q_aBioYeZEAFNenFMMDnzzzZ3p_OQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi all,

unfortunately, I also have to send regrets for today since I have a
seminar this afternoon that I can skip.

Regarding entailment regimes that might not have enough implementations:

- RDF, RDFS, D: should be fine
- OWL Direct Semantics: I'm currently working with derivo, to write a
test runner that they can use with their SPARQL implementation, so
hopefully that's our second direct semantics implementation
- OWL RDF-Based Semantics: Here we might run into problems. One
question is whether just supporting some profile (e.g. OWL RL) is
enough. If we need two OWL Full implementations, I don't think we'll
have that.
- RIF: As Chime said, it looks as if we just have one implementation.

Oracle is not sure whether they can manage to run the tests within the
next month  and I got a response from another implementor (RDF, RDS,
OWL RL), who are not sure whether they can manage the timing, but they
are generally interested in running the tests.

I believe OWLLIM is also able to use entailment, but I didn't get a
response from them. Anybody knows who I could talk to at Ontotext?
I haven't yet contacted BigData and AllegroGraph. Does anybody have an
idea of who I should contact there?

Putting an at risk note for the OWL RDF-Based Semantics, RIF and
possibly OWL Direct Semantics (altough I believe we should manage to
finish writing the test runner) might be a way to go.

Best regards,

Birte

On 22 October 2012 22:29, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Look forward to talking to you tomorrow. Here's what we'll look to cover:
>
> Admin
> Comment processing
> Entailment regime
>
> Review what we know about which regimes we're likely to have implementations
> from
> Consider marking other regimes informative or at-risk
>
> Graph Store Protocol
>
> Implementation status & validator status
> What if GSP does not make it past CR?
>
> Protocol
>
> Implementation status & validator status
>
> Published documents
>
> Publication date: November 6
> "Changes Since Last Call" section
>
> talk to you then,
> Lee
>



-- 
Jun. Prof. Dr. Birte Glimm            Tel.:    +49 731 50 24125
Inst. of Artificial Intelligence         Secr:  +49 731 50 24258
University of Ulm                         Fax:   +49 731 50 24188
D-89069 Ulm                               birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de
Germany
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 09:43:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT