W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2012

BNode label comparisons for JSON/CSV/TSV result tests

From: Chime Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 18:53:01 -0400
To: SPARQL Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <A0F36FC0377B4F379F1DF9218D067096@gmail.com>
I'm working on providing JSON/CSV/TSV result tests for Akamu and the main distinction in most of the tests I'm failing has to do with Blank Node labels.  This might have been discussed before, but should comparisons between results produced by the implementations and the expected results disregard comparison of BNode labels?  In particular, the test document says (in the section regarding the CSV result format): 

"Care should be taken to ensure that results produced in the CSV format are compared properly to the expected result values. In all other respects"

I prefer to not change the implementation of the underlying RDF processor to retain the BNode labels as they appear in the document in order to pass these tests, since they really are only scoped to the containing Turtle document.

Any clarification (or pointers to prior conversation on this topic) would be helpful. 

-- 
Chime Ogbuji
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com)
Received on Monday, 22 October 2012 22:53:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT