W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: Ambiguity between SPARQL 1.1 RDF protocol query via GET and SD retrieval

From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 09:59:26 -0400
Cc: "sandro@w3.org" <sandro@w3.org>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <25D2E4F2-4690-49FC-B374-A7FDF4622E35@evilfunhouse.com>
To: "Polleres, Axel" <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
On Oct 9, 2012, at 9:55 AM, Polleres, Axel wrote:

> Ok, I see two concrete editorial suggestions in the mails:
> 
> 1) suggested text (in SD specification) to fix ambiguity on GET without parameters:
> 
>>>>> "[...] should return a service description document at the
>>>> service endpoint when dereferenced using the HTTP GET operation
>>>> without any query parameter strings provided"
> 
> PROPOSED: implement this change
> 
> 2) suggestion to align terminology between protocol and GSP:
...
> 
> PROPOSED: make resolution to publish protocol and GSP contingent to the editors to align
> terminology and give them respective actions to cross-review and agree on the changes.
> 
> Anything else?

That's all I'm aware of.

thanks,
.greg
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2012 13:59:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT