W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: SPARQL WG Agenda for 2012-Jan-10

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:58:25 -0500
Message-ID: <4F0C8A51.8070708@thefigtrees.net>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 1/10/2012 8:30 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>> Let's see if we can make any progress in 3 areas tomorrow:
>>
>> 1) Graph State Protocol to last call (see recent thread from Sandro);
>> Chime won't be on the call, but let's make what progress we can.
>
> (Oh no, now I've gotten you saying Graph *State* too!)

For the record, I attribute this more to my brain being used to using 
GSP as an acronym for Garden _State_ Parkway then to anything else. :-)

Lee

>
> I'm at some risk for today, in that I'm coming from the dentist and they
> might run late.  Maybe we can move this to the second half of the hour?
> Anyway, I made a different-approach compromise proposal in email just
> sent to Andy [1].    You can skip to the last section of my reply text,
> for the actual proposal.
>
>      -- Sandro
>
>> 2) CSV/TSV document.
>>     * I've expressed hesitation in the past with the fact the differences
>> between the CSV and TSV formats in the document
>> (http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/csv-tsv-results/results-csv-tsv.html),
>> specifically with respect to the encoding of RDF terms in the TSV format
>> and not in the CSV format.
>>
>> 3) Test suite status&  actions for all documents
>>
>> We have regrets from Chime, Axel, and Carlos.
>>
>> Zakim is up and running so we'll use the standard call-in information.
>>
>> Lee
>>
>>
>
> [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012JanMar/0052.html
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2012 18:58:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:47 GMT