W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Today's resolutions on graph store protocol

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:04:50 -0500
Message-ID: <4F0C61A2.705@thefigtrees.net>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

The WG today came to consensus on 4 of the 5 points in Sandro's email 
about the graph store protocol.

The two resolutions to this end are:

RESOLVED: The Graph Store Protocol explicitly applies only to SPARQL 1.1 
Graph Stores

RESOLVED: Remove RFC2119 text from section 5.7 HTTP PATCH and make it 
clear that SPARQL 1.1 Update requests are an option for using PATCH but 
not the only possibility

If you understand & are in agreement with these resolutions, could you 
please implement them in the editor's draft and let us all know? If you 
have any questions about them or disagree, please let us know that too.

We also discussed whether the informative PATCH section should discuss 
PATCHing to a graph store in addition to PATCHing to RDF graph content. 
There seemed to be people on the call (I think Andy and Sandro) that 
felt that that would be a natural use of PATCH in conjunction with a an 
update request that used the GRAPH keyword to specify what was affected. 
What do you think?

Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2012 18:47:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:05 UTC