Sure, looks good to me. Axel On 14 Oct 2011, at 18:48, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > On 14/10/11 11:39, Ivan Herman wrote: > > Lee, Axel, > > > > I have received the request to create URI-s in the /ns/Formats > > namespace[1] for the sparql return formats TSV and CSV. I would think > > that the URI-s > > > > http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/data/SPARQL_Results_TSV > > http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/data/SPARQL_Results_CSV > > > > would be perfectly fine for that. Before I do that, though: > > > > - is it o.k. with you guys? (I do not see why not, but one may never > > know...) > > Yes, good idea. > > >- for the existing formats, eg, JSON[2], the return format > > has its own media type that is duly recorded in the namespace > > document. > > > > Can you confirm that the SPARQL 1.1 WG does not intend to > > register separate media types for those, ie, they would keep the > > original TSV and CSV types (I see that is the fact in the current > > draft[3], but the WG may plan otherwise) > > That's the plan. The TSV and CSV formats are just, well, usage of TSV > and CSV. No data schema. > > Andy > > > > > Thanks > > > > Ivan > > > > > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/ [2] > > http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/data/SPARQL_Results_JSON [3] > > http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-results-csv-tsv/ > >Received on Monday, 17 October 2011 17:37:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:46 GMT