W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Opinions sought: renaming the dataset protocol to graph store protocol

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:21:36 +0000
Message-ID: <4D88CC90.1030301@epimorphics.com>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
CC: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>


On 22/03/11 15:15, Steve Harris wrote:
> I think it's a good idea, the current name is a bit misleading.

+1

>
> - Steve
>
> On 2011-03-22, at 14:48, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>
>> Based on recent conversations, there has been suggestions that since the dataset protocol is defined against (mutable) graph stores, the name we chose in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-01-25#resolution_3, that we change the name to reflect this.
>>
>> The current name is:
>>
>> SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol
>>
>> I'd imagine the alternative name would be:
>>
>> SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol
>>
>> Please use this thread to express support or concern about this proposed change. We'll make a final decision on the name next Tuesday, and I promise that we won't then revisit it again. :-)
>>
>> Lee
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 22 March 2011 16:22:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:45 GMT