- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:21:36 +0000
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- CC: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 22/03/11 15:15, Steve Harris wrote: > I think it's a good idea, the current name is a bit misleading. +1 > > - Steve > > On 2011-03-22, at 14:48, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > >> Based on recent conversations, there has been suggestions that since the dataset protocol is defined against (mutable) graph stores, the name we chose in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-01-25#resolution_3, that we change the name to reflect this. >> >> The current name is: >> >> SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol >> >> I'd imagine the alternative name would be: >> >> SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol >> >> Please use this thread to express support or concern about this proposed change. We'll make a final decision on the name next Tuesday, and I promise that we won't then revisit it again. :-) >> >> Lee >> >
Received on Tuesday, 22 March 2011 16:22:53 UTC