W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Opinions sought: renaming the dataset protocol to graph store protocol

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:15:44 +0000
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <F8B649A1-E160-46B9-A8BB-DA5CB3C0FBF5@garlik.com>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
I think it's a good idea, the current name is a bit misleading.

- Steve

On 2011-03-22, at 14:48, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:

> Based on recent conversations, there has been suggestions that since the dataset protocol is defined against (mutable) graph stores, the name we chose in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-01-25#resolution_3, that we change the name to reflect this.
> 
> The current name is:
> 
> SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol
> 
> I'd imagine the alternative name would be:
> 
> SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol
> 
> Please use this thread to express support or concern about this proposed change. We'll make a final decision on the name next Tuesday, and I promise that we won't then revisit it again. :-)
> 
> Lee
> 

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Tuesday, 22 March 2011 15:16:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:45 GMT