W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Opinions sought: renaming the dataset protocol to graph store protocol

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:56:24 +0000
Message-Id: <8FBEB8DD-F734-491C-B497-7D3F1DCE54EB@deri.org>
To: sparQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

On 22 Mar 2011, at 16:21, Andy Seaborne wrote:

> 
> 
> On 22/03/11 15:15, Steve Harris wrote:
> > I think it's a good idea, the current name is a bit misleading.
> 
> +1

+1, likewise

Axel

> >
> > - Steve
> >
> > On 2011-03-22, at 14:48, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> >
> >> Based on recent conversations, there has been suggestions that since the dataset protocol is defined against (mutable) graph stores, the name we chose in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-01-25#resolution_3, that we change the name to reflect this.
> >>
> >> The current name is:
> >>
> >> SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol
> >>
> >> I'd imagine the alternative name would be:
> >>
> >> SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol
> >>
> >> Please use this thread to express support or concern about this proposed change. We'll make a final decision on the name next Tuesday, and I promise that we won't then revisit it again. :-)
> >>
> >> Lee
> >>
> >
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2011 11:57:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:45 GMT