W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Update Protocol messages

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:55:21 -0500
Message-ID: <4D3D92D9.7040500@thefigtrees.net>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
That would be great. Please just let Greg and me know when you've added 
it, so we can avoid any conflicts should we be editing the doc too (hah. 
:-( )

Lee

On 1/24/2011 9:09 AM, Steve Harris wrote:
> OK, that's great then. My memory is not that good!
>
> I'll volunteer to add an example to protocol-1.1 doc if that helps.
>
> Thanks,
>     Steve
>
> On 2011-01-24, at 14:06, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>
>> We did discuss this at some point and I believe there was a consensus
>> that it ought to be "update".
>>
>> Lee
>>
>>
>> On 1/24/11, Steve Harris<steve.harris@garlik.com>  wrote:
>>>  From what I remember from the protocol telecon, there will be two methods,
>>> one is x-www-form-urlencoded:
>>>
>>> POST /update/test HTTP/1.1
>>> Host: localhost:8888
>>> Accept: text/plain
>>> Content-Length: 62
>>> Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
>>>
>>> [???]=INSERT%20DATA%20%7B%20%3Ca%3E%20%3Cp%3E%20%3Cb%3E%20%7D
>>>
>>> but what should [???] be?
>>>
>>> FWIW, 4store uses "update", and 5store uses "query" - hedging our bets :)
>>>
>>> I'm working on some cross-store client code at the moment, and it's a bit of
>>> a blocker. I have no particular preference, but would like a decision one
>>> way or the other.
>>>
>>> - Steve
>>>
>>> --
>>> Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
>>> 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
>>> +44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
>>> Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
>>> Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
>>>
>
Received on Monday, 24 January 2011 14:55:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:45 GMT