W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Update Protocol messages

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:09:15 +0000
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <910A2F23-A40F-4A69-B566-6861280159F4@garlik.com>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
OK, that's great then. My memory is not that good!

I'll volunteer to add an example to protocol-1.1 doc if that helps.

Thanks,
   Steve

On 2011-01-24, at 14:06, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:

> We did discuss this at some point and I believe there was a consensus
> that it ought to be "update".
> 
> Lee
> 
> 
> On 1/24/11, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote:
>> From what I remember from the protocol telecon, there will be two methods,
>> one is x-www-form-urlencoded:
>> 
>> POST /update/test HTTP/1.1
>> Host: localhost:8888
>> Accept: text/plain
>> Content-Length: 62
>> Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
>> 
>> [???]=INSERT%20DATA%20%7B%20%3Ca%3E%20%3Cp%3E%20%3Cb%3E%20%7D
>> 
>> but what should [???] be?
>> 
>> FWIW, 4store uses "update", and 5store uses "query" - hedging our bets :)
>> 
>> I'm working on some cross-store client code at the moment, and it's a bit of
>> a blocker. I have no particular preference, but would like a decision one
>> way or the other.
>> 
>> - Steve
>> 
>> --
>> Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
>> 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
>> +44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
>> Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
>> Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
>> 

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Monday, 24 January 2011 14:09:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:45 GMT