W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: draft response to RV-5, RV-6

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:58:54 -0400
Message-ID: <4DF6179E.50505@thefigtrees.net>
To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 6/4/2011 5:56 PM, Gregory Williams wrote:
> I've posted a draft response to RV-6:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RV-6
> This clarifies the current state of the Service Description
> conformance text, which differs from the old text which Rob was
> commenting on, and should hopefully address his concerns about
> including multiple service descriptions in a single RDF document.

+1 to this response.

> I've also created a draft response page for RV-5 which includes my
> responses to the service description-specific parts of RV-5, but
> which still needs some responses from Chime regarding the Graph Store
> Protocol.
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RV-5

Best to wait for Chime to respond to the rest of this before sending it 
out, but I'm +1 with the parts that you've responded to so far.


> thanks, .greg
Received on Monday, 13 June 2011 13:59:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:04 UTC