W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: draft response to RV-5, RV-6

From: Chime Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:59:03 -0400
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Cc: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D1EF9CF05B46439783264657D47650EB@gmail.com>
Greg and Lee. I have updated the parts having to do with the Graph Store Protocol in 

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RV-5

-- 
Chime Ogbuji
Sent with Sparrow
On Monday, June 13, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: 
> On 6/4/2011 5:56 PM, Gregory Williams wrote:
> > I've posted a draft response to RV-6:
> > 
> > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RV-6
> > 
> > This clarifies the current state of the Service Description
> > conformance text, which differs from the old text which Rob was
> > commenting on, and should hopefully address his concerns about
> > including multiple service descriptions in a single RDF document.
> 
> +1 to this response.
> 
> > I've also created a draft response page for RV-5 which includes my
> > responses to the service description-specific parts of RV-5, but
> > which still needs some responses from Chime regarding the Graph Store
> > Protocol.
> > 
> > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RV-5
> 
> Best to wait for Chime to respond to the rest of this before sending it 
> out, but I'm +1 with the parts that you've responded to so far.
> 
> Lee
> 
> > 
> > 
> > thanks, .greg
> 
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2011 00:59:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:46 GMT