- From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 17:56:53 -0400
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I've posted a draft response to RV-6: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RV-6 This clarifies the current state of the Service Description conformance text, which differs from the old text which Rob was commenting on, and should hopefully address his concerns about including multiple service descriptions in a single RDF document. I've also created a draft response page for RV-5 which includes my responses to the service description-specific parts of RV-5, but which still needs some responses from Chime regarding the Graph Store Protocol. http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RV-5 thanks, .greg
Received on Saturday, 4 June 2011 21:57:22 UTC