W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: while we are rechartering.... (csv)

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 16:10:23 +0100
Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-Id: <7FAD27D3-D389-4F49-89E6-5CB2C1C00A68@garlik.com>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
On 2011-06-01, at 15:45, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 01/06/11 14:59, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>> We implement this in Anzo. It's very useful.
>> But, we don't have the bandwidth to produce a new recommendation. I
>> can't in good conscience support this work at this time.
>> Lee
> I'll do it.
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/csv-tsv-results/results-csv-tsv.html
> We can at least do a NOTE but for this, given deployed experience, the additional REC cost is lower than it might otherwise be.  Testing is one such cost but we have to do JSON results testing so adding a parallel .csv and .tsv versions would be enough and there are already tools to produce the formats.
> There is no need for content type registration if we go with existing content types.  There are text/csv and text/tab-separated-values.

I'm happy to help out, as I think it's important.

I think I agree with Lee that Rec track would be unwise though.

- Steve

Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 15:10:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:04 UTC