W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: proposed text for SPARQL Update Member Submission

From: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 10:52:50 +0100
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <7993E990-E70A-4B5A-B917-DCE1CBCF75E2@deri.org>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Hi,

On 30 May 2011, at 23:53, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:

> The document at http://www.w3.org/Submission/SPARQL-Update/ is the submission that was a large part of the input to our work on SPARQL 1.1 Update. I have an action (ACTION-296) to suggest text to be added to that URI to indicate its relationship with SPARQL 1.1 Update.
> 
> I suggest either in the abstract or status section a note that says:
> 
> """
> Please note that this W3C Member Submission has been used as input by the [link]SPARQL Working Group in producing the [link]SPARQL 1.1 Update specification. Implementers and users are encouraged to use the SPARQL 1.1 Update document as the authoritative specification for SPARQL Update.
> """
> 

Maybe:

"are encouraged" => "should"

"as the authoritative specification for SPARQL Update" => "as the authoritative specification for managing updates of RDF data"

m2c

Alex.

> Please suggest any changes; otherwise, I'll ask Sandro to add this to the member submission URI in a few days.
> 
> thanks,
> Lee
> 

--
Dr. Alexandre Passant, 
Social Software Unit Leader
Digital Enterprise Research Institute, 
National University of Ireland, Galway
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 09:53:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:46 GMT