W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: proposed text for SPARQL Update Member Submission

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 13:24:00 +0100
Message-ID: <4DE4DDE0.40307@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org


On 31/05/11 10:52, Alexandre Passant wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 30 May 2011, at 23:53, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>
>> The document at http://www.w3.org/Submission/SPARQL-Update/ is the submission that was a large part of the input to our work on SPARQL 1.1 Update. I have an action (ACTION-296) to suggest text to be added to that URI to indicate its relationship with SPARQL 1.1 Update.
>>
>> I suggest either in the abstract or status section a note that says:
>>
>> """
>> Please note that this W3C Member Submission has been used as input by the [link]SPARQL Working Group in producing the [link]SPARQL 1.1 Update specification. Implementers and users are encouraged to use the SPARQL 1.1 Update document as the authoritative specification for SPARQL Update.
>> """
>>
>
> Maybe:
>
> "are encouraged" =>  "should"

+1

> "as the authoritative specification for SPARQL Update" =>  "as the authoritative specification for managing updates of RDF data"

-1 : It's not the only update mechanism (even for SPARQL as we have the 
graph protocol).

	Andy

>
> m2c
>
> Alex.
>
>> Please suggest any changes; otherwise, I'll ask Sandro to add this to the member submission URI in a few days.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Lee
>>
>
> --
> Dr. Alexandre Passant,
> Social Software Unit Leader
> Digital Enterprise Research Institute,
> National University of Ireland, Galway
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 12:24:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:46 GMT