- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 13:24:00 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 31/05/11 10:52, Alexandre Passant wrote: > Hi, > > On 30 May 2011, at 23:53, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > >> The document at http://www.w3.org/Submission/SPARQL-Update/ is the submission that was a large part of the input to our work on SPARQL 1.1 Update. I have an action (ACTION-296) to suggest text to be added to that URI to indicate its relationship with SPARQL 1.1 Update. >> >> I suggest either in the abstract or status section a note that says: >> >> """ >> Please note that this W3C Member Submission has been used as input by the [link]SPARQL Working Group in producing the [link]SPARQL 1.1 Update specification. Implementers and users are encouraged to use the SPARQL 1.1 Update document as the authoritative specification for SPARQL Update. >> """ >> > > Maybe: > > "are encouraged" => "should" +1 > "as the authoritative specification for SPARQL Update" => "as the authoritative specification for managing updates of RDF data" -1 : It's not the only update mechanism (even for SPARQL as we have the graph protocol). Andy > > m2c > > Alex. > >> Please suggest any changes; otherwise, I'll ask Sandro to add this to the member submission URI in a few days. >> >> thanks, >> Lee >> > > -- > Dr. Alexandre Passant, > Social Software Unit Leader > Digital Enterprise Research Institute, > National University of Ireland, Galway > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 12:24:34 UTC