W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: Media type for fed query?

From: Carlos Buil Aranda <cbuil@fi.upm.es>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 10:22:58 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTin-d9r5hcGZvwHNv=CqDYF16q3diQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I don't think it is necessary since this is part of the main query document
and it can't exist alone, so the media type should be similar to the one in
the main query document. Actually they are quite similar.


2011/5/13 Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>

> I realize now that EricP had put in the MIME type section in fed query as
> an example, but suggested that we probably DON'T want a separate media type
> for it:
> """
> It's probably not worth the cost of a differential media type. If it were,
> that registration would probably look like:
> """
> Do you think that we should register a media type for federated query?
> If not, we'll just remove that section from the document.
> Lee
Received on Friday, 13 May 2011 14:26:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:04 UTC