W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: Media type for fed query?

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 10:35:11 -0400
Message-ID: <4DCD419F.6010900@thefigtrees.net>
To: Carlos Buil Aranda <cbuil@fi.upm.es>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Similar is different from the same.

The question is whether the fact that this is an optional extension to 
the query language means that it deserves or needs its own MIME type.

My instinct would be "no".


On 5/13/2011 10:22 AM, Carlos Buil Aranda wrote:
> I don't think it is necessary since this is part of the main query
> document and it can't exist alone, so the media type should be similar
> to the one in the main query document. Actually they are quite similar.
> Carlos
> 2011/5/13 Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net <mailto:lee@thefigtrees.net>>
>     I realize now that EricP had put in the MIME type section in fed
>     query as an example, but suggested that we probably DON'T want a
>     separate media type for it:
>     """
>     It's probably not worth the cost of a differential media type. If it
>     were, that registration would probably look like:
>     """
>     Do you think that we should register a media type for federated query?
>     If not, we'll just remove that section from the document.
>     Lee
Received on Friday, 13 May 2011 14:35:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:04 UTC