W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: Addressing Greg's update review - part 2... (Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Update)

From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:46:47 -0400
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <79556A66-6633-4949-ACC9-B1A5A84D4BA1@evilfunhouse.com>
To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
On Apr 25, 2011, at 11:13 PM, Axel Polleres wrote:

> 16)
>>> "Dataset(QuadPattern, μ ) = Dataset-UNION ( Dataset(QuadPattern1, μ ) , Dataset(QuadPattern2, μ ) )": The definition of Dataset-UNION in section 4.2.1 is defined as taking one graph store and one dataset as arguments, but here is used with two datasets.
> *Open: Hmmm, we also say that "i.e., the graph store can be viewed as a mutable RDF dataset" i.e. for the sake of these definitions, I don't really want to make a difference, to be honest, as I am afraid it would further complicate things. I was hoping this is clear enough. Do you consider this remark critical?

"Critical" might be a bit too far, but I think it's important to fix this, as the text as written conflicts with the earlier definition.

Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2011 13:47:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:04 UTC