- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:23:04 -0500
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
> I've revised it by adding the "We could add something like" text.
Okay by me.
- s
> Andy
>
> On 11/02/2010 3:18 PM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> > This response seems good to me.
> >
> > Lee
> >
> > On 2/10/2010 10:36 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> >> Draft response for comment N3-1
> >>
> >> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:N3-1
> >>
> >> Sandro - there is the specific issue of expressions. As property paths
> >> already use * and + for their natural regex meaning, expressions might
> >> well need to be delimited anyway. It is a balance of what is the best
> >> use of the undelimited form and delimited forms in the overall syntax,
> >> together with design style and parser complexity.
> >>
> >> We could add something like:
> >> """
> >> In N3Alternatives#Syntax there is discussion of including expressions in
> >> N3. Property paths already use * and + for their regex meanings. Adding
> >> expressions as well overloads several characters so possibly requiring
> >> syntax to delimit an expression.
> >> """
> >>
> >> Andy
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> > ______________________________________________________________________
>
Received on Monday, 22 February 2010 21:23:11 UTC