W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: Draft response for comment N3-1

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:18:17 +0000
Message-ID: <4B82F499.30702@talis.com>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I've revised it by adding the "We could add something like" text.

	Andy

On 11/02/2010 3:18 PM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> This response seems good to me.
>
> Lee
>
> On 2/10/2010 10:36 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> Draft response for comment N3-1
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:N3-1
>>
>> Sandro - there is the specific issue of expressions. As property paths
>> already use * and + for their natural regex meaning, expressions might
>> well need to be delimited anyway. It is a balance of what is the best
>> use of the undelimited form and delimited forms in the overall syntax,
>> together with design style and parser complexity.
>>
>> We could add something like:
>> """
>> In N3Alternatives#Syntax there is discussion of including expressions in
>> N3. Property paths already use * and + for their regex meanings. Adding
>> expressions as well overloads several characters so possibly requiring
>> syntax to delimit an expression.
>> """
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 22 February 2010 21:18:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:41 GMT