- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:18:17 +0000
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I've revised it by adding the "We could add something like" text. Andy On 11/02/2010 3:18 PM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > This response seems good to me. > > Lee > > On 2/10/2010 10:36 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: >> Draft response for comment N3-1 >> >> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:N3-1 >> >> Sandro - there is the specific issue of expressions. As property paths >> already use * and + for their natural regex meaning, expressions might >> well need to be delimited anyway. It is a balance of what is the best >> use of the undelimited form and delimited forms in the overall syntax, >> together with design style and parser complexity. >> >> We could add something like: >> """ >> In N3Alternatives#Syntax there is discussion of including expressions in >> N3. Property paths already use * and + for their regex meanings. Adding >> expressions as well overloads several characters so possibly requiring >> syntax to delimit an expression. >> """ >> >> Andy >> >> > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 22 February 2010 21:18:50 UTC