- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:08:17 +0000
- To: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
c.f. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Feb/0006.html --- Emanuele, Thanks for your comment regarding the SPARQL 1.1 working draft syntax for aggregate operations. The working group did consider an aggregate design similar to the one you propose while discussing the various syntax options. However, the overall opinion of the group was that the familiarity of the SQL-style aggregate operations was of a greater benefit than the terseness of the syntax. - Steve Harris, on behalf of the SPARQL WG. -- Steve Harris, Garlik Limited 2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK +44 20 8973 2465 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 10:08:48 UTC