W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: Draft Response to ED-1

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:55:24 -0500
Message-ID: <4B740C4C.2070006@thefigtrees.net>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
CC: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
This response seems fine to me.

Lee

On 2/11/2010 5:08 AM, Steve Harris wrote:
> c.f.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Feb/0006.html
>
>
> ---
>
> Emanuele,
>
> Thanks for your comment regarding the SPARQL 1.1 working draft syntax
> for aggregate operations.
>
> The working group did consider an aggregate design similar to the one
> you propose while discussing the various syntax options.
>
> However, the overall opinion of the group was that the familiarity of
> the SQL-style aggregate operations was of a greater benefit than the
> terseness of the syntax.
>
> - Steve Harris, on behalf of the SPARQL WG.
>
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 13:55:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:41 GMT