W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: Reminder/agenda: tomorrow: "SPARQL WG Dedicated Teleconference for HTTP RDF Update Issues"

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 09:57:53 -0400
Message-ID: <4C0CFAE1.6070904@thefigtrees.net>
To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi everyone,

The code for the teleconference (starting now) is 772775. We'll be in 
#sparql as usual.

Lee

On 6/7/2010 9:08 AM, Axel Polleres wrote:
> I refined the agenda a bit and added links at:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-06-07
>
> 	 Determining base URI for the cases that involve graph=g
> 		 Chime's last mail
> 	 The term "networked RDF knowledge"
> 		 andy e.g. suggests "RDF data"
> 		 chime can live with "RDF knowledge"
> 		 more discussion?
> 	 Whether we've settled Kjetil's issue involving http-range-14 as a reference etc.
> 		 ISSUE-49
> 		 last mail on that
> 		 could/should we discourage that "http" resources that respond to a GET request with a 2xx response be used as graph-uris? not sure...
> 	 Issue in Section 5.3: "How would a client come to discover the URI of the network-manipulable RDF dataset?"
>
> If you have any more http rdf update issues, please speak up!
>
> talk to you in an hour! (a volunteer for scribing would be appreciated!)
>
> Axel
>
> On 6 Jun 2010, at 21:07, Axel Polleres wrote:
>
>> This was decided last week, but unfortunately we have problems with the minutes still (rrsagent wasn't there). The dedicated HTTP RDF update conf is gonna be
>>
>>    tomorrow June 7th: 10am ET = 3pm BST
>>
>> Roughly, we will have to discuss the following items:
>>
>> + Determining base URI for the cases that involve graph=g
>> + The term "networked RDF knowledge"
>> + Whether we've settled Kjetil's issue involving http-range-14 as a reference etc.
>>
>> I will try to detail this a bit more by later tonight (still travelling).
>> The call is scheduled for 2 hrs, let's see whether we need all of it.
>>
>> best,
>> Axel
>>
>>
>> On 28 May 2010, at 03:42, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Our first dedicated teleconference on property path issues was very
>>> successful. I'd like to try to schedule another one to discuss open
>>> issues with our HTTP RDF Update specification, particularly surrounding
>>> embedded graph= parameters, terminology (knowledge et al.), base URIs, etc.
>>>
>>> If you are interested in participating in a dedicated, *2 hour*
>>> teleconference on open HTTP RDF Update issues, please fill out the
>>> scheduling poll at this link:
>>>
>>> http://doodle.com/6k555386gp5resku
>>>
>>> I've tried to include all reasonable days&  times in the next 2 weeks.
>>>
>>> Please reply before Tuesday's teleconferenceWe'll try to choose a time
>>> at the end of this week.
>>>
>>> Lee
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 7 June 2010 14:05:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:42 GMT