W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: IRI creation and encoding

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:22:41 +0100
Cc: "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <64B768FA-4AAB-4A7A-B0B2-BBD7E3F1B992@deri.org>
To: "Andy Seaborne" <andy.seaborne@talis.com>

On 7 Jun 2010, at 14:14, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 07/06/2010 1:06 PM, Axel Polleres wrote:
> > I was asking whether  IRI(string) should - like xsd:integer - be allowed as a partial mapping for strings representing IRIs, ie. just the same way as for literals representing IRIs. Is that already covered somehow?
> 
> Seems to be the only point you are making is whether the section
> "Constructor Functions" is changed to include IRI or whether it should
> be renamed.

Not really the only one, I also wanted to ask why/whether IRI does/doesn't apply to xsd:string typed literals?

> 
> I confess I for one would rather not create confusion from
> 
> "http://example/"^^xsd:anyURI vs <http://example/>

hmmm, do you think that moving IRI together with the casts would create this confusion?

Axel
 
> 
>         Andy
> 
Received on Monday, 7 June 2010 13:29:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:42 GMT