W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:37:43 -0500
Message-ID: <4B083377.2010307@thefigtrees.net>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
CC: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Steve Harris wrote:
> On 21 Nov 2009, at 14:21, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
>> On Tuesday 10. November 2009 11:26:15 Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>> So my conclusion is that we can get BGPs, GRAPH, FILTERs to work
>>> without  changign the template instantiation process but the graph
>>> combinations operations to work requires changes to the template.
>>
>> So, this debate died out, and I feel that it means that we have rough
>> consensus and that can resolve this on the next teleconf.
>>
>> How about voting on this:
>>
>> PROPOSAL: In cases where the WHERE clause only consists of BGP, GRAPH and
>> FILTER, the template may be omitted from the a  DELETE [ FROM <uri> ]* {
>> template } [ WHERE { pattern } ] query.
> 
> I feel that the consensus was more on:
> 
> DELETE [ {template} ] WHERE { pattern }

Kjetil says omitting the template, so I think you are saying the same thing?

Oh, I see, the grammar there says the opposite of what the English says.

I think?

Lee
Received on Saturday, 21 November 2009 18:38:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:40 GMT