W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: [pedantic-web] ERRATA in examples for Query

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:22:00 -0400
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <26CEE6FF-9DFC-4703-B6A4-46DDD0EF999A@cyganiak.de>
To: pedantic-web@googlegroups.com

On 31 Oct 2009, at 16:14, Axel Polleres wrote:
> small thing which we may want to add to the errata:
> The pedantic-web folks [1] pointed me to some errors in:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/vcard-rdf/3.0#
>
> which is not adhering to linked data principles, see [2] for details.
>
> I'd prefer to fix such issues in the upcoming version, i.e. not  
> dereferencing example
> vocabularies/namespaces that have broken RDF from W3C specs.  
> Ideally, we can resolve
> that by fixing  http://www.w3.org/2001/vcard-rdf/3.0#
> which -- as [2] suggests -- doesn't seem to be trivial, since we  
> aren't sure who can
> actually fix it. otherwise, we may just want to change the example  
> to something else than vcard?

There is actually an updated version of vCard in RDF at [1], which is  
syntactically valid. Its namespace is:

http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns#

I think some concepts in there are named differently from the 2001  
version, so the examples should be double-checked, but updating to  
this newer version is all you'd need to make pedantic-web happy.

Richard

[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns




>
> best,
> Axel
>
>
> 1. http://pedantic-web.org/
> 2. http://groups.google.com/group/pedantic-web/browse_thread/thread/229de280636a7614
Received on Saturday, 31 October 2009 20:22:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:40 GMT