W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2009

RE: First (rough) F2F agenda

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:45:17 +0000
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B6CF1054FDC8B845BF93A6645D19BEA3694058EA8F@GVW1118EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Steve Harris
> Sent: 24 October 2009 09:05
> To: Axel Polleres
> Cc: SPARQL Working Group
> Subject: Re: First (rough) F2F agenda
> 
> 
> On 23 Oct 2009, at 17:10, Axel Polleres wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I put a first *rough* agenda for F2F2 online at
> >
> >       http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-F2F2

> 
> I would like to see a discussion of INTO / GRAPH in day 2. Even if
> it's just to get an idea of people's enthusiasm in various directions.
> It also relates to CONSTRUCT, as I've seen many requests 

(Minor:) Do you have pointers to concrete requests?  I'd like to understand the whole context.

> for a
> CONSTRUCT { GRAPH ... } operation from users and that would be a
> natural extension.

Seems sensible.

The barrier to doing this is not SPARQL itself but the lack of a standard serialization for the output of named graph CONSTRUCT.

SPARQL/Data anyone?
 :-)

	Andy

> 
> - Steve
> 
> --
> Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
> 2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK
> +44(0)20 8973 2465  http://www.garlik.com/

> Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
> Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10
> 9AD
> 

Received on Thursday, 29 October 2009 13:46:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:40 GMT