That's Option 5. - Steve On 11 Aug 2009, at 16:11, Axel Polleres wrote: > ... still catching up, looking at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009JulSep/0139.html > > and reflecting on what was discussed in the end of the telconf, it > seems that the unspoken option 9 was something like having the > endpoint description either in a named graph > > such that you could query over it using > > GRAPH <endpoint> > or GRAPH <> > > or that queries using > > FROM <endpoint> > FROM <> > > should/could be allowed to query the dervice description directly > via the endpoint? > > > not sure, guess that Orri answer to Action-80 will shed more light > on this. > > Axel > > > > > > -- > Dr. Axel Polleres > Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of > Ireland, Galway > email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/ > -- Steve Harris Garlik Limited, 2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK +44(0)20 8973 2465 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9ADReceived on Tuesday, 11 August 2009 15:36:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:39 GMT