W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2009


From: Simon Schenk <sschenk@uni-koblenz.de>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:27:42 +0200
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Cc: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1246426062.8446.6.camel@tweety>
Am Dienstag, den 30.06.2009, 21:58 +0100 schrieb Steve Harris:
> <> Might be more conventional. That depends on what BASE defaults to  
> though. It will still map to some graph inside the store, which  
> restricts the things you can import into the store without confusing  
> the discovery.

I don't understand. If <> is mapped to some graph, whose name no one
except for the endpoint itself needs to know, the name does not need a
globally valid name. Then, there should be no problem?

Simon Schenk | ISWeb | Uni Koblenz
Five sentences policy: http://five.sentenc.es/

Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2009 05:28:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:57 UTC