W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2009


From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:49:39 -0400
Message-ID: <4A4B0703.3070706@thefigtrees.net>
To: Simon Schenk <sschenk@uni-koblenz.de>
CC: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Simon Schenk wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 30.06.2009, 21:58 +0100 schrieb Steve Harris:
>> <> Might be more conventional. That depends on what BASE defaults to  
>> though. It will still map to some graph inside the store, which  
>> restricts the things you can import into the store without confusing  
>> the discovery.
> I don't understand. If <> is mapped to some graph, whose name no one
> except for the endpoint itself needs to know, the name does not need a
> globally valid name. Then, there should be no problem?

I believe the problem is that <> has a well-defined name - it's whatever 
base URI is in effect when executing the query.

Don't ask me to repeat/recite the rules for determining the base URI 
though, because I always have to go look them up.

Or maybe I'm misunderstanding :)

Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2009 06:50:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:57 UTC