W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2009


From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <Kjetil.Kjernsmo@computas.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:12:33 +0200
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-Id: <200907011312.33523.Kjetil.Kjernsmo@computas.com>
On Tuesday 30 June 2009 22:58:45 Steve Harris wrote:
> > So that could be DESCRIBE <.>
> <> Might be more conventional. 

I find the idea of DESCRIBE <endpoint-URI> (and the special case DESCRIBE <> 
which refers to the endpoint itself in the absence of a different base) 
appealing, but I am wondering if we could address the problem of discovering 
endpoints on a server too (and I really don't like the "magic URI" option).

I found this in the HTTP 1.1 spec:

"If the Request-URI is an asterisk ("*"), the OPTIONS request is intended to 
apply to the server in general rather than to a specific resource."

Perhaps that could be of use? 


would return a list of endpoint URIs? This could be an optional part of the 
spec to not place too much of a burden on implementers that don't need it. 

Kind regards 

Kjetil Kjernsmo
Senior Knowledge Engineer / SPARQL F&R Editor
Mobile: +47 986 48 234
Email: kjetil.kjernsmo@computas.com   
Web: http://www.computas.com/


Computas AS  PO Box 482, N-1327 Lysaker | Phone:+47 6783 1000 | Fax:+47 6783 
Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2009 11:29:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:57 UTC