W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Requesting input for the Features and Rational document

From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <Kjetil.Kjernsmo@computas.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:42:03 +0200
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-Id: <200906101042.03254.Kjetil.Kjernsmo@computas.com>
On Thursday 04 June 2009 08:46:29 Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> > * ProjectExpression needs a better description and motivation.
> > We feel that the mention of XSLT is not very relevant, as assigning a
> > name automatically, like some engines do now, is sufficient for XSLT.
> > It should also be motivated by showing why it is required by other
> > features.
>
> I took a stab at this at
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Feature:ProjectExpressions

As discussed on the teleconf yesterday, it needs better examples too. It 
doesn't sound like the examples are actually executeable as it is now, and 
they should be. Also, it is also a good thing if they do not rely on other 
features that we do not yet have, such as concat().

It is good to have both SELECT and CONSTRUCT examples. 

Can anyone have a stab at this? 

Kind regards 

Kjetil Kjernsmo
-- 
Senior Knowledge Engineer / SPARQL F&R Editor
Mobile: +47 986 48 234
Email: kjetil.kjernsmo@computas.com   
Web: http://www.computas.com/

|  SHARE YOUR KNOWLEDGE  |

Computas AS  PO Box 482, N-1327 Lysaker | Phone:+47 6783 1000 | Fax:+47 6783 
1001
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2009 08:42:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:39 GMT