W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: [snip] subqueries and datasets

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 12:48:08 -0400
Message-ID: <4A046248.3070608@thefigtrees.net>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
CC: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Bijan Parsia wrote:
> On 8 May 2009, at 16:02, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-
>>> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lee Feigenbaum
>>> Sent: 8 May 2009 05:41
>>> To: SPARQL Working Group
>>> Subject: [ISSUE-8] subqueries and datasets
>>>
>>> (Not sure if the email tag identifying the issue is useful. What do you
>>> think?)
>>
>> A link at the top of the message is more valuable to me than the tag 
>> in the form ISSUE-number.
> 
> The cool thing about using issue and action tags/mentions is that 
> tracker keeps track of them:
>   http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/8
> 
> I found this very handy in the OWL WG.

whoa, awesome.

does it handle any other syntax or did i just semi-accidentally stumble 
on the right way of doing it?

Lee

> 
> Cheers,
> Bijan.
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 8 May 2009 16:48:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:38 GMT