On 8 May 2009, at 16:02, Seaborne, Andy wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg- >> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lee Feigenbaum >> Sent: 8 May 2009 05:41 >> To: SPARQL Working Group >> Subject: [ISSUE-8] subqueries and datasets >> >> (Not sure if the email tag identifying the issue is useful. What do >> you >> think?) > > A link at the top of the message is more valuable to me than the tag > in the form ISSUE-number. The cool thing about using issue and action tags/mentions is that tracker keeps track of them: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/8 I found this very handy in the OWL WG. Cheers, Bijan.Received on Friday, 8 May 2009 16:47:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:42:12 GMT