W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: [snip] subqueries and datasets

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 17:46:54 +0100
Cc: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <A65852E5-2FBC-467D-80D5-BCF14B734B6D@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
On 8 May 2009, at 16:02, Seaborne, Andy wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-
>> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lee Feigenbaum
>> Sent: 8 May 2009 05:41
>> To: SPARQL Working Group
>> Subject: [ISSUE-8] subqueries and datasets
>>
>> (Not sure if the email tag identifying the issue is useful. What do  
>> you
>> think?)
>
> A link at the top of the message is more valuable to me than the tag  
> in the form ISSUE-number.

The cool thing about using issue and action tags/mentions is that  
tracker keeps track of them:
   http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/8

I found this very handy in the OWL WG.

Cheers,
Bijan.
Received on Friday, 8 May 2009 16:47:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:38 GMT